Impact of Covid-19 pandemic on injection-based practice: report from an Italian multicenter and multidisciplinary survey.

Background: There are no papers exploring the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the injection-based practice in patients affected by different rheumatic diseases, including osteoarthritis. The aim was to investigate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on injection-based practice trough the Italian country. Study design: A survey-based retrospective cross-sectional study. Methods: An Italian-language questionnaire was developed by a group of senior researchers and distributed by e-mail to some Rheumatology, Orthopedic and Rehabilitation Units from different geographic areas of Italy. The survey included information about the number of injections performed during COVID-19 pandemic (stratified by injected agents and injected joint), in comparison to the pre-pandemic period, and the possible reasons behind an eventual reduction. Responses were collected and descriptive analysis calculated. Results: Eleven centers of the National Health Service completed the survey. The activities of the injections services significantly decreased across the country with a percentage of reduction of 60% compared to the pre-pandemic period. A significant reduction of both intra-articular and peri-articular injections was registered. Among intra-articular. treatments, the most affected ones were the hyaluronic acid injections, when compared to corticosteroids. A significant decrease of the total amount of peri-articular injections was observed. The strict government restrictions and the fear of patients to become infected represented the most limiting factors. Conclusions: The reported decrease of the injection-based practice in our country during the COVID-19 pandemic highlights the detrimental effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management of chronic musculoskeletal diseases with possible negative consequences in terms of disability and quality of life.

COVID-19 impact on colorectal cancer care in 2020: Preliminary data from the Italian COVID-DELAY study

Background: Since March 2020, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has rapidly spread worldwide causing a massive Health Care crisis with Italy among the most affected countries. Oncology care has been widely derailed and cancer screening programs halted to effectively face the pandemic. Aim of our multicenter study is to assess how COVID-19 has impacted on the likelihood of receiving timely diagnosis, staging and treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients (pts) during the 2020 compared to pre-pandemic period. Material (patients) and methods: All consecutive medical records of newly diagnosed CRC pts referred to 4 Italian Oncology Departments between March and December 2020 were evaluated. Monthly access rate and temporal intervals between date of symptoms onset, radiological and cytohistological diagnosis, treatment start and first radiological evaluation were analyzed and compared with the same months of 2019. Differences between the two years were evaluated using Fisher's exact or chisquare test for categorical variables and unpaired Student t test, or the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. Results: A considerable drop (20%) in newly diagnosed CRC cases emerged compared to 2019 (214 vs 268). The lockdown period was more impacted by such decrease compared to the other months (percentage drop 40% vs 12%). New CRC diagnoses in 2020 were less likely to be diagnosed with early stage (stage I-II-III) CRC (67% vs 72%). Other clinical and tumor characteristics such as age, gender, sidedness and mutational status were similar regardless of the year. Looking at pts management, no differences were seen in terms of interval between symptom onset and radiological diagnosis (median 19 days in 2020 vs 28 days in 2019, p=0.88), symptom onset and cytohistological diagnosis (25 vs 36 days, p=0.27), symptom onset and treatment start (median 86 vs 100 days, p=0.79). However, less CRC were discussed in multidisciplinary tumor meetings during the 2020 (45% vs 54%, p=0.07). Conclusions: While COVID-19 effects on cancer pts' outcome might unfold in the years to come, our preliminary data show a remarkable drop in early stage CRC diagnoses throughout 2020. The Italian Oncology Departments managed to optimally tackle the quality care issue ensuring prompt diagnosis and treatment despite the pandemic evolving scenario. Further investigation, including larger case series, are warranted to offer a more exhaustive picture of the impact of COVID-19 emergency on cancer care.

Drop in early-stage colorectal cancer diagnoses after COVID-19: Preliminary report from the COVID-DELAY study

Background: By the end of 2020, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) would have indelibly marked the cancer care setting. With Italy at the forefront of pandemic, unprecedented measures were adopted to tackle the quality care issue. As a result of pausing screening programs, diagnostic delays might affect the years to come. Aim of our multicenter Italian study is to evaluate whether the COVID-19 outbreak has impacted on likelihood of receiving timely diagnosis, staging and treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients (pts) after March 2020 compared to pre-pandemic time. Methods: Medical records of all consecutive newly diagnosed CRC pts referred to 4 Italian Oncology Departments between March and December 2020 were examined. Access rate (number of pts/days) and temporal intervals between date of symptoms onset, radiological and cytohistological diagnosis, treatment start and first radiological evaluation were analyzed and compared with the same months of 2019. Differences between the two years were evaluated using Fisher’s exact test or chi-square test for categorical variables and unpaired Student t test, or the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. Results: A reduction (20%) in newly diagnosed CRC cases was seen when compared with 2019 (214 vs 268). The decline was greater in the lockdown period compared to the other months (percentage drop 40 % vs 12%). Newly CRC pts in 2020 were less likely to be diagnosed with early stage (stage I-II-III) CRC (67% vs 72%). Other clinical and tumor characteristics were similar regardless of the year. Looking at pts management, no differences emerged in terms of interval between symptom onset and radiological diagnosis (median 19 days in 2020 vs 28 days in 2019, p = 0.88), symptom onset and cytohistological diagnosis (25 vs 36 days, p = 0.27), symptom onset and treatment start (median 86 vs 100 days, p = 0.79). However, less CRC were discussed in multidisciplinary tumor meetings during the 2020 (45% vs 54%, p = 0.07). Conclusions: While COVID-19 repercussions will be likely felt for decades to come, our data suggest an alarming drop in early-stage CRC diagnoses during the first pandemic year. Conversely, our study draws the attention on the efforts made to ensure diagnostic-therapeutic pathways proper operation. Legal entity responsible for the study: The authors. Funding: Has not received any funding. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

“Covid-working”: what to keep and what to leave? Evidence from an Italian company

Purpose: This paper aims to explore the extent to which Covid-19 has challenged work habits and outcomes. The authors argue that after the lockdown period workers have been experiencing a new work mode called “Covid-working”. The aim is to provide a first interpretation of this phaenomenon and elaborate on future real estate strategies and workplace policies based on this experience. Design/methodology/approach: Using survey data, this research analyses Covid-working in a large-sized company in Italy. The survey was answered by 90 employees and addresses three domains: locations of work;a comparison between work-from-home (WFH) and work from the office;and outcomes of Covid-working vs office-working. Findings: With Covid-working, the workers of the case company drastically changed their traditional work from the office approach to pure WFH. While this abrupt switch might generate difficulties in adaptation, this working practice was generally appreciated by this company’s workers. Positive and negative outcomes of Covid-working confirm previous studies on remote working. Recommendations on multi-location of work, new value for the headquarters and diversity empowerment open up avenues for future real estate strategies. Originality/value: Observations on Covid-working are still limited and mainly appear on grey literature, due to the newness of this phaenomenon. Empirical studies such as the proposed one can increase companies’ awareness of the positive and negative outcomes of this experience and support their future workplace strategies. © 2021, Chiara Tagliaro and Alessandra Migliore.